Enrolment List - Off-campus English Activity (English Flea Market Event 2012-2013) (10 March 2013)

The following students have been selected to join our school's off-campus English Activity (English Flea Market Event 2012-2013) on 10 March 2013:

Enrolment List (Updated on 28 Feb 2013)

1	1B	YIM SZE WAN
2	2C	CHAN WANG HEI
3	1B	MOW CHING YIU
4	1B	MO CHEUK LAM
5	2A	NG KA YU
6	2A	SO WAI SHAN
7	2B	WAN PIK KEI
8	2B	HO HUI MAN
9	1C	LI TING YI
10	1C	KO WING
11	1C	NGAI CHING YEE
12	1A	TSE TSQ CHING
13	2A	WONG CHEUK YIU
14	1B	KOWK KA HIN
15	1A	KEVIN LEE

Enrolment List - Off-campus English Activity (Exchange with International Christian School) (15 March 2013)

The following students have been selected to join our school's off-campus English Activity (Exchange with International Christian School) on 15 March 2013:

Enrolment List (Updated on 5 Feb 2013)

1	1A	15	To Wing Kiu
2	1A	19	Chan Ho Chuen
3	1A	20	Chan Ki Hong
4	1B	11	Mow Ching Yiu
5	1B	16	Yim Sze Wan
6	1C	5	Dai Ho Yi
7	1C	11	Leung Hei Yuet
8	1C	14	Ng Sin Yee
9	1C	21	Chan Chuk Hei
10	1C	27	CHOI KIN TING
11	1C	35	WONG Hok Ling
12	1D	1	Gwyneth Chan
13	1D	11	Lo Hiu Tung
14	2A	12	Ng Ka Yu
15	2A	15	So Wai Shan
16	3C	11	Pang Yuk Yu
17	3D	12	Ng Hoi Kei
18	3F	7	Lee Ho Yi
19	5A	6	No Man Yong, Kara
20	5B	25	Chan King Ho
21	5D	7	Lam Hok Yee
22	5D	13	Liu Ka Lai

All About National Education Boycott (5B Simon Chan)

A lot of controversy has been provoked due to the implementation of the government’s national education curriculum. After the announcement of not forcing schools to adopt the curriculum, I am clearer that I am leaning towards the government’s side, opposing the boycott.

Firstly, freedom is always one of the internal values of Hong Kong. Upholding the treasurable value, we should respect every school’s decisions on implementing the curriculum or not. The participants should never ask for a total ban on the curriculum, or otherwise, they are becoming dictators like the one we are opposing.

Apart from that, the boycott brings no benefits. The boycott participants are mainly tertiary students, they should cherish their limited learning sessions. As the government has already backed down, they should know that there is no or very low possibility for it to accept student’s petition once again, especially when most of the protestors before changing their minds right after the back down. Thus, it is completely unwise of the attendants to spend their valuable time on an event which has no positive effects.

The boycott students may argue that the curriculum may become a brainwashing tool of the Chinese government. Yet, isn’t it a responsibility of people to understand more about their country? Hong Kong is not an exception. The national education curriculum aims to help HongKongers gain more knowledge about their nation. Neither the curriculum instructions nor the Education Bureau have mentioned any words related to brainwashing. Wouldn’t they be too sensitive and even let the imaginary shortcoming cover all of its benefits?

To conclude, the boycott violates Hong Kong’s freedom, brings no benefits and too sensitive to ignore the advantages of the national education curriculum. These are the points that the participants should think of.